AnnotationMotivationAndExpectation

From Filtered Push Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search


Stream of consciousness after telecon March 28 with Paolo Ciccerse. Decision taken to make Evidence a subclass of Motivation

Kinds of Motivation

In general for all science
Evidence
How do we distinguish confirming vs contradicting evidence?--Bob Morris 00:02, 29 March 2011 (EDT)
Consistency with a published data standard
Data integration

Kinds of Evidence

In general for all science ---supportive or contradicting
published papers
data item
data set
logical assertions
multimedia records of observations
authority services or files
For biodiversity science
specimens
sequences
For XXX science?

Perhaps neuroscience? ocean science?


Issues

Make a separate data QC ontology that invokes AO?

Purpose is to keep AO focused only on universal concerns of annotation. Fork a new page if discussion gets big.

How to distinguish supportive from contradicting Evidence

Other

Did we decide whether hasMotivation is meant to act on an Annotation or on a Topic?--Bob Morris 00:02, 29 March 2011 (EDT)

Still discussing the analog of opaque interpretable objects. Where to put the hints for interpretation, e.g. PKI keys, schema's that drive an interpretation, etc.

Most of the above might not need much but namespaces?? --Bob Morris 00:02, 29 March 2011 (EDT)